Full freedom, that awaited paradigm of happiness which even though it is vogue never becomes. Is and will remain being undoubtedly a panacea with little probability of scope. The freedom will be always something relative and limited, because while when the human chose by interest and its own survival the coexistence within an environment social, learned that in order get said benefit would have of resign to a part of its independence. This would imply the acquisition of certain behaviors, disciplines, actions and requirements Yes, would facilitate the compliance of the group activity, but which become an individual subject to carry out actions and make decisions that go against your principles, what is called "acrasia". This would explain part of the constant feeling of dissatisfaction and nonconformity set forth in their conduct.
"The confusing collective scene of excessive cities and its entangled complexity raises the captivity and poses a threat to the free capacity of thought and movement of the person"